House of the Dragon has already demonstrated with its emphasis that it won’t be duplicating Game of Thrones’ villain issue. Game of Thrones may have been one of the most popular television programs ever, but as it entered its final few seasons, it was subject to tremendous criticism. The Night King, the show’s main adversary, seizing control of the storyline and erasing the tales of some of the more complex villains was one of the reasons for that scrutiny. However, it appears like House of the Dragon season 1 will focus more on the more nuanced human opponents.
In many respects, The Night King proved advantageous for Game of Thrones. The Night King served as the principal antagonist of Game of Thrones and offered the divided nation of Westeros a common enemy to unify against, something the House of the Dragon appears to be adamantly avoiding. One central conflict that the entire series might revolve around and reach its climax around was The Night King. Game of Thrones, however, suffered from the Night King’s significance overshadowing some of the famed political intrigue and interpersonal turmoil in the program.
Because the authors were left with too many untied threads, several of the show’s most complex and compelling adversaries, like as Petyr Baelish, a.k.a. Littlefinger, or Cersei Lannister, had fairly hurried and anticlimactic endings. Cersei Lannister’s passing was indeed dramatic, but many thought her tale wasn’t adequately wrapped up. Because none of the opponents in House of the Dragon are wholly bad, the series will be able to further develop their characters and avoid the hurried endings several Game of Thrones characters had.
House Of The Dragon Doesn’t Have Villains, Just Deeply Flawed People
In House of the Dragon, the adversaries are far more nuanced and complicated as people. Even though there were many such individuals in Game of Thrones, the Night King was always the focal point. The tale of House of the Dragon is considerably more intimate. It depicts the tale of a family and all of the internal strife. The intricate interpersonal dynamics that underpin the series are well shown by the father-daughter connection that exists between Viserys Targaryen and his successor, Rhaenyra. Another notable example is the connection that Rhaenyra Targaryen had with Alicent Hightower, which underwent significant alterations. The spectator must decide which among a cast of imperfect individuals is worse than the others because there are no apparent villains. The narrative of House of the Dragon is driven by internal problems that finally explode thanks to a superb cast and writing team that create some of the most fascinating characters on television. As a result, the program is able to circumvent the typical good-versus-evil dichotomy found in fantasy shows.
Why The Night King Wouldn’t Work As A House Of The Dragon Villain
Although The Night King is a well-known antagonist, his inclusion in House of the Dragon would be problematic for a number of reasons. For starters, the threat posed by the White Walkers is somewhat less terrifying now that there are so many dragons, many of which are decades old and fairly huge. The White Walkers appear to be far more defeatable with sapphire blue eyes Aemond Targaryen riding Vhagar and Daemon Targaryen riding Caraxes. Furthermore, all the war that had already weakened and dispersed the Westerosi army made the threat presented by the Night King considerably more formidable in Game of Thrones. Theme-wise or realistically, the Night King would not work in House of the Dragon.
Game of Thrones’ faults appear to have been learned from by House of the Dragon. It won’t employ a central antagonist like the Night King, allowing it to have a lot more satisfying and satisfying conclusion than Game of Thrones did. The choice to employ a cast of opponents that are more ethically nuanced will allow it to focus more on character growth and conclude their arcs more satisfactorily than Game of Thrones.
